World Earthquake monitoring & prediction


Mass-resonance magnification due to Earth's astronomical alignments


Full Moon

hover your mouseHover your mouse over an alignment to see its effect on Earth ~M6+ seismicity as na increase-peak-decrease pattern in M6.2+ peak-magnitudes. Mars alignments not seen as affecting Earth seismicity.hover your mouse

In two or more events within minutes at same location (obviously same peak-oscillation magnification), only strongest event is used. For example, M6 Chile of 7 Nov 2015 07:04:30 was discarded as the M6.8 peak of
07:31:43 was used; M6.8 Chile of 11 Nov 02:46:19 discarded as M6.9 (as est. by USGS at least) peak of 01:54:38 was used; M7.6 Peru of 24 Nov 22:45:38 discarded and M7.6 of 22:50:54 used.


M6+ seismicity mostly occurs at alignment onset. For 100%-successful 2011-2014 test-phase see archives. Forecast can change once alignment starts. "~" means ±5%, so M5.7-6.2 are for pattern enhancement.

"Most M6+ earthquakes arise as the Earth begins aligning with 2 heavenly bodies..."



It is too often asserted that a "successful seismic forecast" is the one which can successfully predict: earthquake's location, time, and size (magnitude). But satisfying this all-or-none approach has turned out futile. The insistence on the absolute forecast has been impractical, to say the least. Such a most stringent requirement is found in no other science or human endeavor. Are we talking double standards here?


For you don't refuse a cancer medicine which does not cure the terminal illness but does turn it into a chronic condition!  You don't discard a weather forecast for not telling you the exact hour and minute, as well as the part of the city to be hit with that downpour!  Yet, we somehow developed an expectation of seismologists that they must tell us exactly when and where the next killer-earthquake will strike. Or else they're - "useless"!


Although many lives and huge property are at stake here, seismic forecasts are usually dismissed unless absolute. They are mostly rejected as scaremongering, unscientific, etc.  But the antiforecast that you'll find on this site tells the exact days without killer-quakes - anywhere on Earth, years ahead. It also tells, mostly days ahead once M6+ seismicity picks up, where the next big one is most likely to strike...

"...while most M7+ earthquakes arise at 2 alignments simultaneously..."

Science of earthquake forecasting


"Mechanics" of it↔

Moving part(s) in a simplest mechanical oscillator can interact in different ways, such as friction. That interaction gives rise to electricity, magnetism, chemical and/or structural changes, and so on...



The same can be shown for our planet as well, under the gravitational force of the Moon and other heavenly bodies as they affect all geomasses: core, mantle, rocks; stirring our atmosphere even...



Extending that georesonator concept mathematically (to our entire Universe) shows it holds universally. This gives it predictive powers such as forecasting of quakes - anywhere in the Solar system!



Georesonance Geod Acta 20(6) (2007)
♦ A Solar-system demonstration (2011)
♦ An independent confirmation (2012)
Hyperresonance J Eur R Soc 1(1) (2012)
♦ An independent confirmation (2015)

*Important points about scientific seismic forecasting:

• Based on discovered increasepeakdecrease pattern in M6+ seismicity strength as Earth aligns with 2 heavenly bodies for 3+ days
• The increase begins normally at the onset of the alignment (which obviously can occur only within the Solar system's "plane")
• As 2 such alignments begin simultaneously - the M7+ seismicity gets set off on Earth (except for its polar zones)

• A very long alignment (lasting for 2+ weeks) also sets off the M7+ seismicity (except for the polar zones)

• Why M6 cut-off? M6+ quakes account for ~2/3 of quakes-energy, faithfully representing Earth
• Our entire instrumented seismic records (since 1890s) exhibit the same pattern
• The above applies to seismotectonics of all heavenly bodies.

pattern example

A PICTURE IS WORTH A THOUSAND WORDS: emphasized sample of the discovered pattern in M6+ earthquakes' strength: always increasingpeakingdecreasing during an astronomical alignment(s) between the Earth and two other celestial objects within our Solar system's "plane" that last for 3+ days (or the mantle's response-time (to forced oscillation) for releasing the M6+ seismicity).

"...and Half of M8.5+ earthquakes on record had occurred during the Full Moon."


    status pointer
  • Quakes
  • Hazard
  • Map legend

Felt it? Share it!

Report a seismic event to us, or tweet about it

Thank you! Your submission has been received!

Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form :(

"Forecast vs. Antiforecast"

Our clients

The seismic forecast which tells when for sure there won't be any catastrophic earthquakes anywhere on Earth
is much more a "dream come true" for financial (insurance primarily) industry, than a forecast which pinpoints
(when and where) such a disaster will strike. Here's an incomplete list of some of our regular clients since 2011:

CNA Insurance   Wells Fargo   ING Group    Newmont Gold Company   Genentech    Chicago Mercantile Exchange

Credit Suisse US State Department Pershing LLC    Zurich American Insurance Group   Petrobras   Pictet

Barclays Capital US Department of Defense Toronto Dominion Bank Saudi Arabian Oil Company US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration US Geological Survey

Brown Brothers Harriman Bank   Inter-American Development Bank   Cambridge Associates   Pioneer Natural Resources     Fidelity Investments Royal Bank of Canada

Any risks or damages from investing that is based on information found on are sole responsibility of the investor. Organizations can contact us for assistance.

Secured by PayPal